莫让岁月倦了等待的心，我的世界随你到天涯遥远。

窗前灯火此刻悄悄熄灭，我心轻轻擦亮你如水的容颜。

你的笑容仍甜美一如当年，你的消息是你珍藏的依恋。

繁花过后落叶暂时没荒野，承诺永远不如记的每个今天。

你我相隔遥远，人世偷偷改变，历经万水千山，能否心意相连。

不求生生世世，不管朝朝暮暮，只求平平淡淡，携手同游人间。

谁说两地缱绻，最是扰人心田，谁说人海沉浮，难有恒久情缘？

不管分分合合，也许聚聚散散，只求平平安安，携手同游人间。



很老的一首歌曲，第一次应该是小时候看电视包青天时听到的，应该是某一辑的片尾曲。当时很喜欢这么淡淡的风格，所以印象很深，到现在还记得旋律。最近K歌时第一次点了这首歌，虽然旋律和歌词都太温柔很不适合我这种粗人唱，还因为不认得缱绻两字糗了一把；但不管怎样，事隔这么久再次重听这首好听的老歌，有种幸福的感觉

gui1 nie4

圭：测日影器；臬：射箭的靶子；圭臬：比喻事物的准则。比喻把某些言论或事当成自己的准则。

清·钱泳《履园丛话》：“三公者，余俱尝亲灸，奉为圭臬，何敢妄生议论。”

升级链接是http://cm.my.yahoo.com/upgrade

新版支持多页面，共享模块或页面，rss预览/全文阅读，theme，快速链接/书签，新邮件到达时还响一声等等。界面相当炫（以至于不适合上班时间使用），这里附上一张截图：






和google，microsoft，netvibes等类似服务不同的是，广告占得地方好大，还是flash。看来雅虎这次底气很足嘛，就不知用户们会不会买账了



更新：看了一下My Yahoo网页代码，发现广告现在添加的方式很简单，太好了！写几行GreaseMonkey代码拿掉它好了，想安装的点这里。

更新2：在MyYahoo意见簿上提了两点意见：第一，新闻模块的条数过多的话应允许定期被其他条目替换（而不是只列出前十条）；第二，对于有的模块希望能够定制成首条显示标题和摘要，其他条目只显示标题。

出于对微软live search方向的兴趣，今天特地跑去听微软的这个讲座。坦白说听后感觉很是失望，不是说讲的东西怎么不好（今天介绍了local live search和auto pilot架构），而是觉得两个微软员工准备的不是很充分，只是根据自己做的方向挑了两个小地方随便说了说，基本上没听到我感兴趣并想了解的（比如微软对现今搜索状态有什么看法？微软live search将着力解决什么问题？微软来做和其他公司的做法会有什么不同？优势又在哪里？等等）。回家后又重看了讲座预告，发现这个讲座本该是live search副总裁Christopher Payne来讲，稍觉纳闷。结果晚上就看到Christopher即将离职的新闻。这才明白讲座不能令人满意原来是因为临阵换帅啊。

一个不错的比较，摘自OTN

---

Making the Choice

The build process is a key component in any J2EE project, and there are a number of build tools to choose from. For the purposes of this article, our discussion will be limited to two of the most popular J2EE build tools: Maven and Ant.

Maven and Ant are open-source projects from the Apache Software Foundation, and choosing between them is one of the most important decisions a project leader can make. Maven aims to help developers build, test, and document their Java projects easily and in a consistent way. It is a powerful tool, and it can very helpful for managing a project during its life cycle.

Ant is the most popular build tool in the Java world. It is a very flexible tool; however, this flexibility comes at a price. Many enterprise projects suffer from obese Ant scripts, which are difficult to manage after the build owner leaves the group.

To help you choose between these tools, here is a high-level comparison:

	Ant	Maven
Installation	Very easy	Very easy (very similar to Ant)
Time to start a new project	5 minutes	15 minutes
Time to add a new functionality	10 minutes to add a new target	2 minutes to use a new goal
Time to learn for a new developer	30 minutes. Very easy to understand, and very good tool support.	2 hours. Can be confusing at the beginning.
Standard layout	No (which is good; you can do whatever you want).	Yes (which is good, all your projects will look the same).
Multi-project support	Yes, but you have to do your own master build file.	Yes, with the Maven Reactor
Documentation generation	No standard way to do it, but there are plenty of available tools.	Yes
IDE integration	Yes	Very basic

My recommendation is to choose Ant if you know what you're doing and want absolute control over your build mechanism. However, if you are unsure about your project structure and do not have much experience with build systems, choose Maven. Maven will provide you with a good project layout and excellent tools to help you across the whole project life cycle.